PWG> Re: JMP> MOD & JMP - Adding why to join ipp and jmp DLs

PWG> Re: JMP> MOD & JMP - Adding why to join ipp and jmp DLs

PWG> Re: JMP> MOD & JMP - Adding why to join ipp and jmp DLs

Jay Martin jkm at underscore.com
Thu Jan 8 15:34:41 EST 1998


Good idea, Tom.  This should be a standard addition to any
public spec the PWG produces.


	...jay


----------------------------------------------------------------------
--  JK Martin               |  Email:   jkm at underscore.com          --
--  Underscore, Inc.        |  Voice:   (603) 889-7000              --
--  41C Sagamore Park Road  |  Fax:     (603) 889-2699              --
--  Hudson, NH 03051-4915   |  Web:     http://www.underscore.com   --
----------------------------------------------------------------------




Tom Hastings wrote:
> 
> Both the IPP Model document and the JMP Job Monitoring MIB document
> list the email DL and how to join, using ipp-request at pwg.org and
> jmp-request at pwg.org.
> 
> I'd like to see a sentence added as to why an implementor might
> want to join the DL.
> 
> Implementors will find things that need clarification.
> 
> Also both standards have registration processes for adding
> additional attributes and values.
> 
> I've talked with Ron Bergman about this for the Job Monitoring MIB
> and he thought it was a good idea.
> 
> How about adding the following sentence right after the mention
> of the ipp-request at pwg.org and jmp-request at pwg.org in the Author's
> addresses section:
> 
> Implementors of this specification are encouraged to join this e-mail
> distribution list in order to partipate in any discussions of
> clarification issues and review of registration proposals for
> additional attributes and values.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom



More information about the Pwg mailing list