PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

Caruso, Angelo Angelo.Caruso at usa.xerox.com
Tue May 19 11:03:01 EDT 1998


Roger,


But if we ever want to push PWG work through the IETF standards track, it
sure would be easier if we followed their rules to begin with. Do you have a
specific objection to counting individual votes rather than companies?


Angelo


-----Original Message-----
From: Roger K Debry [mailto:rdebry at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 1998 9:31 AM
To: pwg at pwg.org
Subject: RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document




Tom,


I thought IETF requires voting by *individual* rather than *company* or
*organization*. So counting individual votes would automatically put the PWG
process in sync with IETF rules.


Thanks,
Ang


Ahh, but this is not the IETF.   The PWG is really a consortium of printing
companies,
so counting company votes seems more appropriate.


Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry at us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080





---




More information about the Pwg mailing list