PWG> Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)

PWG> Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)

PWG> Re: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)

Keith Moore moore at cs.utk.edu
Thu Jul 2 16:47:44 EDT 1998


For your further information

Carl-Uno

---

> Are you going to insist on ipp: in order to pass on the IPP specs?

IESG is.  Nobody could make a case for it being any other way.

Keith





More information about the Pwg mailing list