PWG> Process for sending documents to the IESG - from Chris Wellens

PWG> Process for sending documents to the IESG - from Chris Wellens

PWG> Process for sending documents to the IESG - from Chris Wellens

Tom Hastings hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
Fri Jul 3 17:07:56 EDT 1998


Here are some tips for projects sending documents to the IETF:  PMP, FIN,
and JMP.

>From: "Chris Wellens" <chrisw at iwl.iwl.com>
>To: "Ron Bergman" <rbergma at dpc.com>,
>        "Tom Hastings" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>
>Cc: "Lloyd Young" <lpyoung at lexmark.com>, <don at lexmark.com>,
>        <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>, <cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com>
>Subject: Re: Job MIB Status with the IETF
>Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 17:49:02 PDT
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>
>I hope Lloyd advised you that the Job MIB was incorrectly sent to the wrong
>email address for "Informational RFCs" coming out of "Working Groups".  The
>process for Informational RFCs coming out of individual submissions is
>different.  The latter is a documented process and the former is not.
>
>Anyhow, the right person who was supposed to get the Job MIB was Steve Coya.
>Lloyd and I forwarded the document Ron forwarded to us, and requested, in
>our capacity as WG Co-Chairs, that it be published as an Informational RFC.
>
>Certainly no harm in chatting with Jon Postel about it, if you like.
>
>This reminds me ... I just noticed that Harry submitted the Finisher MIB,
>and he put on the document that it was the product of the "IETF Printer MIB
>Working Group".  It might be easier and better to not say that and rather
>use individual names, as it tends to get less scrutiny and is a simpler
>process.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Hastings <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>
>To: Ron Bergman <rbergma at dpc.com>
>Cc: Lloyd Young <lpyoung at lexmark.com>; chrisw at iwl.com <chrisw at iwl.com>;
>don at lexmark.com <don at lexmark.com>; hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
><hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
><cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com>
>Date: Wednesday, July 01, 1998 10:51 AM
>Subject: Re: Job MIB Status with the IETF
>
>
>>Is Jon Postel the RFC Editor?
>>
>>If so, I could give him a call.  I established a good working relationship
>>with him on adding the IANA Considerations to IPP.  He is near by in
>>Santa Monica.
>>
>>I could call him, if he is the RFC Editor about the Job Monitoring MIB
>>as an Informational RFC.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Tom
>>
>>At 18:30 6/30/98 PDT, Ron Bergman wrote:
>>>Lloyd,
>>>
>>>Is there any change in the status of the Job MIB with the IETF?
>>>
>>>I was hoping that I would be able to report some progress at next weeks
>>>meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ron Bergman
>>> Dataproducts Corp.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>



More information about the Pwg mailing list