IFX> RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard [ and future PDF/is standard]

IFX> RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard [ and future PDF/is standard]

IFX> RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard [ and future PDF/is standard]

Harry Lewis harryl at us.ibm.com
Fri Mar 14 23:44:28 EST 2003


What about the -actuals which just passed last call and formal approval? 
Seems if everybody is getting a number, this should too.
---------------------------------------------- 
Harry Lewis 
IBM Printing Systems 
---------------------------------------------- 




"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>
Sent by: owner-ifx at pwg.org
03/14/2003 05:55 PM
 
        To:     pwg at pwg.org
        cc:     ifx at pwg.org
        Subject:        IFX> RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed 
XHTML/Print standard [  and future PDF/is standard]


So Don is suggesting that the PDF/is standard which is also a document
format standard could be also numbered in the 5102 series along with the 
two
XHTML/Print document format standards (5102.1 and 5102.2) when we assign a
PWG IEEE-ISTO number to PDF/is.

Comments?

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: don at lexmark.com [mailto:don at lexmark.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 06:02
To: Hastings, Tom N
Cc: Lewis, Harry
Subject: RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard



Tom:

The documents (and their full titles) are available from

http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/HTML-Version/XHTML-Print.html
http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/HTML-Version/CSS-Print.html

I think making the 5102 series be document formats makes sense.

**********************************************
 Don Wright                 don at lexmark.com

 Chair,  IEEE SA Standards Board
 Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
 f.wright at ieee.org / f.wright at computer.org

 Director, Alliances & Standards
 Lexmark International
 740 New Circle Rd
 Lexington, Ky 40550
 859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
**********************************************




"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com> on 03/13/2003 05:28:42 PM

To:    don at lexmark.com
cc:    "Lewis, Harry" <harryl at us.ibm.com>, "Hastings, Tom N"
       <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>
Subject:    RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print 
standard


Don,

That is what I remembered, so 5102.1 and 5102.2 sound OK?

What are the full titles of each?

We (or your WG) can decide later whether the 5102 series is for any PWG
document format, such as PDF/is, or just for XHTML-like stuff or just for
XML-related document formats or whatever, right?

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: don at lexmark.com [mailto:don at lexmark.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:58
To: Hastings, Tom N
Cc: Lewis, Harry
Subject: Re: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard



Just a reminder that the XHTML-Print group has TWO documents at Proposed
Standard Status so we need two numbers.

**********************************************
 Don Wright                 don at lexmark.com

 Chair,  IEEE SA Standards Board
 Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
 f.wright at ieee.org / f.wright at computer.org

 Director, Alliances & Standards
 Lexmark International
 740 New Circle Rd
 Lexington, Ky 40550
 859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
**********************************************



"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>@pwg.org on 03/13/2003
03:22:42 PM

Sent by:    owner-pwg at pwg.org


To:    "Lewis, Harry" <harryl at us.ibm.com>
cc:    pwg at pwg.org
Subject:    PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO  number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard


Harry,

Per the discussion today at the SM telecon on PWG process about standards
numbers and what to do about allocating a PWG number for the Proposed PWG
XHTML/Print standard as requested by Don for the W3C.

In order to give Don a PWG number for the XHTML/Print Proposed PWG
Standard,
the next series of numbers not yet used is 5102.n.

Currently, Proposed PWG standards have the following numbers:

5100.1, 5100.2, 5100.3, 5100.4 ... for IPP

5101.1 for the Media Standardized Names

So how about 5102.1 for XHTML/Print.  If there are several documents,
5102.1
and 5102.2


ISSUE:  How to number future standards?  We can decide later how to
allocate
numbers for:

PWG Semantic Model
Print Services Interface
IPPFAX
PDF/is
etc.

Is the 5102 series for document formats, so that PDF/is would go in that
series?

Should IPPFAX go in its own series, or should it be in the IPP 5100.n
series?

Should PWG Semantic Model be in its own series?

Should PSI be in its own series?

Or is there some common theme that would help put some of these in the 
same
series.


ISSUE:  Separate isssue is what happens when the Proposed/Candidate
Standard
reaches Standard?

Does it get a new number or use the same number?  If a new number could it
be some algorithm from its original number, such as adding 50.  So 5150.2
would be the Standard version of Proposed standard 5100.2.

Tom








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/pwg/attachments/20030314/0ed7a8c6/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Pwg mailing list