[SM3] AllowedValue(s)

[SM3] AllowedValue(s)

[SM3] AllowedValue(s)

Manchala, Daniel Daniel.Manchala at xerox.com
Thu Jan 16 19:03:06 UTC 2014


Norbert,

The schema discussions will be held during the sm3 meetings (alternate Mondays 11:00 - 12:00 PT). You are in the right mailing list (sm3 is the new mail list for sm and mfd). Next meeting is Jan 20.

Some of the scan related discussions are taking place in the IPP WG forum (alternate Mondays 12:00 - 2:00 PM PT). Next meeting is Jan 27. Please see the discussions on the mail list for Cloud & IPP as sometimes an urgent scan discussion will be held during those time periods (e.g., there might be one on Jan 20 between 1:00 - 2:00 PM after the Cloud discussion - not sure about it).

Thanks,
Daniel.


________________________________________
From: sm3-bounces at pwg.org [sm3-bounces at pwg.org] on behalf of Norbert Schade [Norbert.Schade at conexant.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:15 AM
To: Semantic Model 3.0 Workgroup discussion list
Subject: Re: [SM3] AllowedValue(s)

Daniel,
As I'm working intensely with the scan section of the schemas these days, I'd be interested to follow that process.
Is there a regular call for it?
Am I following the right mailing list ('sm' and 'mdf' are declared 'old')?
Norbert

-----Original Message-----
From: sm3-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:sm3-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Manchala, Daniel
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:37 PM
To: 'sm3 at pwg.org'
Subject: Re: [SM3] AllowedValue(s)

Norbert,

The schemas are being updated. We are designing the schemas for SM3, and will be fixing some of these issues.

Thanks,
Daniel.

-----Original Message-----
From: sm3-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:sm3-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Norbert Schade
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:13 PM
To: sm3 at pwg.org
Subject: [SM3] AllowedValue(s)

Working with the PWG schemas for MFD devices.
The files are from Dec 2012, the namespace ends '2012/12/sm'. Supposed to be the latest official version.

I'm wondering why some features show an 'AllowedValue' object and some an 'AllowedValues' object (watch the extra 's').
First I thought this may be related to the max number of objects on that level (like no 's' if only 1 else 's' or something like that).
But nope.

As I'm still early in getting familiar with the schemas this may be my ignorance.
Help appreciated.
Regards
Norbert


Norbert Schade
Systems Engineer (printing)
Imaging Solutions
Conexant Systems, Inc.
201 Jones Road
Waltham, MA 02451
U.S.A.
Tel: 1-781-370-8929
Email: norbert.schade at conexant.com<mailto:norbert.schade at conexant.com>


Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************

"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."

**********************************************************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
sm3 mailing list
sm3 at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3
_______________________________________________
sm3 mailing list
sm3 at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3
_______________________________________________
sm3 mailing list
sm3 at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3


More information about the sm3 mailing list