[SM3] New SM3 Draft Charter Uploaded to PWG FTP Site

[SM3] New SM3 Draft Charter Uploaded to PWG FTP Site

[SM3] New SM3 Draft Charter Uploaded to PWG FTP Site

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Mon Aug 24 17:24:20 UTC 2015


Hi,

I agree with all of Mike's comments.

I like Mike's revised problem statement.

I'm opposed to any mention at all of 3D when the 3D work is strictly BOF
in PWG and has not become a work item in IPP WG (and is unlikely to
do so in this calendar year, IMHO).

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:

> Paul,
>
> > On Aug 23, 2015, at 9:56 PM, Paul Tykodi <ptykodi at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Per an action item from the last F2F, a new SM3 draft charter has been
> uploaded to the PWG FTP site.
>
> 1. The problem statement should probably be re-written based on the
> current focus, e.g.:
>
>     "The Semantic Model workgroup is responsible for maintaining the PWG
> Semantic Model and defining new mappings and abstract models as needed to
> support interoperability and data exchange between Imaging Systems.  The
> PWG Semantic Model is an abstract version of the Internet Printing Protocol
> model and semantics which enables interoperability and data exchange with
> other protocols and XML schema."
>
> 2. The schema maintenance should probably be the first work item, since it
> is the primary ongoing task.
>
> 3. Drop PPDMAP.  Please.  It is not an "on hold" specification, we've
> agreed to drop it several times already and I am not available to be an
> editor for it.
>
> 4. I'm not sure the 3D stuff needs to be there; if we end up moving
> forward with an IPP version of the specification, the semantic model work
> would be schema maintenance.
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> sm3 mailing list
> sm3 at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3
>


More information about the sm3 mailing list