[SM3] JDFMAP

[SM3] JDFMAP

[SM3] JDFMAP

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Tue Mar 14 17:12:31 UTC 2017


Hi Bill and Mike,

Agreed - that's the right process.

I'll take a look at the spec draft for obvious update work (references,
style
of conformance statements, etc.) and try to assess the time needed.  Not
sure if I'll have answers by March 23 (Nancy will be out-of-town at an EMS
conference, so I'll be extra busy), but I'll have answers soon.

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Jan-April: 579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
May-Dec: PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:

> Bill,
>
> Yes, that is the correct process for an informational document.
>
>
> > On Mar 14, 2017, at 12:23 PM, wamwagner at comcast.net wrote:
> >
> > The Mapping CIP4 JDF to PWG PJT (JDFMAP) specification has been in
> Prototype state waiting for notice of prototype since June 2015. With the
> hibernation of the SM workgroup, it is desirable that this substantive work
> not be lost. It was agreed at the February face-to-face that this
> specification should be put up as a Best Practices informational PWG
> document.
> >
> > Looking at Process 3.0, it states that Best Practice publications are”
> formal Working Group documents that undergo naming, Last Call and Formal
> Approval just like a Working Draft”. While the meaning of this may not be
> as clear as one might like, I take this to mean that the document:
> > • Be identified as a Best Practices candidate
> > • Be put at a Stable level (after some review and update---I expect that
> some of the reference, at least, must be revised)
> > • Be presented to the PWG membership for Last Call
> > • Last Call comment be addressed and resolved
> > • The document be put to PWG vote
> >
> > If there is agreement on this, I would ask Ira and Rick ti take a quick
> look to see what may need updating. The current version is at
> http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/sm3/wd/wd-smjdfmap10-20150604.pdf.  We then
> may call a brief SM conference, perhaps for 23 March, to get working group
> approval and to initiate Last Call.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill Wagner
> >
> >
> > Sent from Mail for Windows 10
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sm3 mailing list
> > sm3 at pwg.org
> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>
> _______________________________________________
> sm3 mailing list
> sm3 at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3
>


More information about the sm3 mailing list