WBMM> Queues

WBMM> Queues

WBMM> Queues

Harry Lewis harryl at us.ibm.com
Thu Jul 24 13:19:23 EDT 2003


WBMM is growing in scope, and I'm ok with that... (I think Bill might 
remind me that I contributed to this by insisting that WBMM scope include 
the intranet and devices, themselves). 

I think we're going to need to subset, however, to make any reasonable 
schedule. I suggest priorities are

1. Extranet device management, monitoring and administration
2. Intranet and extranet device and services management, monitoring and 
administration
3. Intranet and extranet device, services and spool or queue management, 
monitoring and administration

---------------------------------------------- 
Harry Lewis 
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems 
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
---------------------------------------------- 



"TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <bobt at hp.com> 
Sent by: owner-wbmm at pwg.org
07/24/2003 10:54 AM

To
"'McDonald, Ira'" <imcdonald at sharplabs.com>, Harry 
Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS, wbmm at pwg.org
cc

Subject
RE: WBMM> Queues






I do think doing some sub-setting makes sense - in the case of queues, not
all devices/services managed by WBMM will have queues to manage. 

Once we understand the potential subsets, we can talk about which ones 
need
to be in WBMM 1.0, and which can follow (or potentially be done in 
parallel.

bt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:44 AM
> To: 'Harry Lewis'; wbmm at pwg.org
> Subject: RE: WBMM> Queues
> 
> 
> Hi Harry,
> 
> Apparently we want to focus on WBMM device management first 
> (per most of our WBMM discussions).
> 
> However, that doesn't do PSI any particular good, which still 
> would require the box labelled "and then a miracle happens" 
> to get a PSI Print Service (or Target Device) installed or 
> reconfigured after installation.
> 
> Do we care that all PSI implementations will ship without 
> standards-based management for several more years?
> 
> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald
>   High North Inc
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl at us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:38 PM
> To: wbmm at pwg.org
> Subject: WBMM> Queues
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry I missed the call. On the topic of queue management. 
> I've no objection to adding this but wonder if it might 
> warrant some subsetting of WBMM. Are you going to have to be 
> able to manage queues to be WBMM compliant? Don't we want to 
> focus on solving the device management problem first, and 
> then move on to queue management? 
> ---------------------------------------------- 
> Harry Lewis 
> Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> http://www.pwg.org
> IBM Printing Systems 
> http://www.ibm.com/printers
> 303-924-5337
> ---------------------------------------------- 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20030724/6997b8ec/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Wims mailing list