Yes, I'll build a 'wims-local-date.zip' bundle (with the short filenames
without date suffixes) and post it to the WIMS FTP site.
BUT - note that this is WSDL/2.0 - there is no released tool in the
universe that UNDERSTANDS this to be WSDL/2.0. XML SPY and browsers
simply understand it to be well-formed XML. Even the new XML SPY 2006
ONLY supports and graphically displays WSDL/1.1 definitions.
This is the problem for WIMS - we want to normatively specify WSDL/2.0
and not WSDL/1.1 (which can't even express some of these bindings and
details of encoding/serialization) - but the W3C isn't finished with
the responses to the second last call (October 2005) comments.
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zehler, Peter [mailto:Peter.Zehler at xeroxlabs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 8:02 AM
> To: McDonald, Ira
> Subject: RE: WIMS> Posted WSDL/2.0 for WIMS v0.10 (28 November 2005)
> Could you save me some busy work and send me a zip of your WSDL and
> associated schemas?
>>> Peter Zehler
> Xerox Innovation Group
> Email: Peter.Zehler at XeroxLabs.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
> McDonald, Ira
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 8:26 PM
> To: 'wims at pwg.org'
> Subject: WIMS> Posted WSDL/2.0 for WIMS v0.10 (28 November 2005)
>> Hi folks, Monday (28
> November 2005)
>> I have just posted a first draft of informative WSDL/2.0 for WIMS/1.0
> which specifies complete bindings for the Agent and Manager Interfaces
> over HTTP/1.1 (direct XML in HTTP POST), SOAP/1.1, and SOAP/1.2.
>> This XML specification for this WSDL file (but NOT the WSDL itself)
> validates without warnings using XML SPY 2004, XRay 2.0, and
> Amaya 9.2.2
> (the free W3C Browser) at:
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/schemas/wimsbind-20051128.wsdl> - WSDL/2.0 for WIMS/1.0 v0.10
>> I think that this draft specifies completely unambiguous
> bindings, when
> combined with the rules in the latest W3C WSDL/2.0 drafts
> (August 2005).
> The specification is blessedly short because application
> errors are NOT
> exported as WSDL faults (and mapped to SOAP and HTTP faults
> as well) as
> was done in PSI/1.0. W3C WSDL/2.0 in fact recommends self-contained
> protocols that avoid the binding of out-of-band faults, when possible.
>> I'm continuing work on example messages in SOAP and HTTP envelopes.
> - Ira
>> PS - This document can be viewed as XML with IE, Firefox,
> Netscape, and
> other browsers. The 'structured view' in the free W3C Amaya is
>>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
> phone: +1-906-494-2434
> email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com>