WIMS> RE: [ping] Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs

WIMS> RE: [ping] Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs

WIMS> RE: [ping] Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs

McDonald, Ira imcdonald at sharplabs.com
Mon Feb 13 15:17:04 EST 2006


Hi John,

Second ping.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:58 PM
> To: 'John Crandall'; McDonald, Ira
> Cc: wims at pwg.org; wg-cimcore at dmtf.org
> Subject: RE: [ping] Proposed format for PWG mapping strings 
> in CIM MOFs
> 
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> Any comments yet?
> 
> Cheers,
> - Ira
> 
> 
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
> phone: +1-906-494-2434
> email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Crandall [mailto:jcrandal at Brocade.COM]
> > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:35 PM
> > To: McDonald, Ira
> > Cc: wims at pwg.org; wg-cimcore at dmtf.org
> > Subject: RE: Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry I did not see this.  I will check the spec and get back 
> > by Monday.
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 12:31 PM
> > To: John Crandall; McDonald, Ira
> > Cc: 'wims at pwg.org'; 'wg-cimcore at dmtf.org'
> > Subject: Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs
> > 
> > Hi John,
> > 
> > Some background.  The PWG is a member organization of
> > the IEEE-ISTO.  The PWG standards-track has only two 
> > levels, Candidate Standard and Standard.  All current
> > PWG standards-track documents are at the first level.
> > Each PWG standards-track document is assigned a 
> > permanent document number when it reaches Candidate
> > Standard level, of the form "PWG 51xy.z", e.g., PWG
> > 5105.1 is the PWG Semantic Model.  Note that _dot_
> > infixed in the document number.
> > 
> > I suggest the following ABNF for PWG mapping strings
> > (using productions from RFC 4234 'ABNF'):
> > 
> > pwg-ms   = DQUOTE pwg-num "." "PWG" "|" pwg-text DQUOTE
> > pwg-num  = "PWG" "51" 2digit "-" 1*digit
> > pwg-text = *(SP / VCHAR)
> > 
> > For example, using this format:
> > 
> >   MappingStrings { "PWG5101-1.PWG|Section 4 Media Color Names" }
> > 
> > The pesky infixed dot has been converted to a hyphen.
> > 
> > Comments?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > - Ira (editor of PWG CIM refresh white paper)
> > 
> > 
> > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> > Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> > PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
> > phone: +1-906-494-2434
> > email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
> > 
> > 
> 



More information about the Wims mailing list