Hi Rick,
I just imported your improved description clauses for
the five StatusXxx properties into my template class.
In CR 901 as posted, you have four Write qualifiers
(for MAX-ACCESS read-write objects). There should
be six. Per RFC 3805, the missing two are:
- StackingOrder
- PageDeliveryOrientation
I would urge that _if_ we preserve the Write clause
at all for CIM printing properties (I'd personally rather
NOT preserve it), we should NOT pick and choose,
but should preserve it uniformly.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org]On Behalf Of
Richard_Landau at Dell.com
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:47 PM
To: wims at pwg.org
Subject: WIMS> CIM> Posted CR for CIM_PrintOutputTray
This is the CR that I submitted to the CIM Core Schema WG, as CIMCoreCR00901
HYPERLINK
"ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/cim/CIMCoreCR_PrintOutputTray_03.htm"ftp://f
tp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/cim/CIMCoreCR_PrintOutputTray_03.htm
rick
----------------------
Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, Stds & System Mgt Architecture, CTO Office
+1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3, MS RR5-09, Round Rock, TX 78682
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 2/10/2007
9:15 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20070211/aff44c7c/attachment.html