Thank you. I just missed it (and I actually tried not to). That's one
more thing to fix before we do a final ballot on this class.
I agree we should not pick and choose in the class, but we should make
it clear that implementations may choose not to permit writing on some
or all properties. Details to be supplied in a profile. I really do
want to permit writing, though, so that one can at least change media
names, default trays, and so forth. But not prtGeneralReset.
From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:07
To: Landau, Richard; wims at pwg.org
Subject: RE: WIMS> CIM> [Bugs - missing Write] Posted CR for
I just imported your improved description clauses for
the five StatusXxx properties into my template class.
In CR 901 as posted, you have four Write qualifiers
(for MAX-ACCESS read-write objects). There should
be six. Per RFC 3805, the missing two are:
I would urge that _if_ we preserve the Write clause
at all for CIM printing properties (I'd personally rather
NOT preserve it), we should NOT pick and choose,
but should preserve it uniformly.
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org]On Behalf Of
Richard_Landau at Dell.com
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:47 PM
To: wims at pwg.org
Subject: WIMS> CIM> Posted CR for CIM_PrintOutputTray
This is the CR that I submitted to the CIM Core Schema WG, as
Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, Stds & System Mgt Architecture, CTO
+1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3, MS RR5-09, Round Rock, TX 78682
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date:
2/10/2007 9:15 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...