Well - all these changes will take awhile to digest.
At our last WIMS teleconference there was support for leaving
the history in, but oh well...I just want some closure SOON.
I really dislike your raised emphasis on the newly chartered
IETF EMAN WG (especially given that MANY of the IETF
projects fail entirely or else drag out for years). Waiting for
IETF EMAN would be a serious mistake for HCD vendors.
And quickly, the first question has gone badly awry:
On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to “no importance” and 10
corresponds to “critical consideration”, ...
Is the scale supposed to be 1 to 5 or 1 to 10?
Do we really know how this will be represented in the survey?
WHY wouldn't we ask simple yes/no questions? This 1 to 5
stuff just makes summary results fuzzier, it seems to me.
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
May to Christmas:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:09 PM, William Wagner <wamwagner at comcast.net>wrote:
> I have posted suggested revisions to the article and the questions at
>>>> I apologize, but these changes are to the original draft, not the latest.
>> Although a red-line MS Word view may appear to suggest drastic changes, the
> changes are more to order than to content. However, I do suggest that we
> drop the history, since I think MPSA interest will be more on what is going
> to happen (that affects them) than what happened. Also, considering that
> some portion of the audience is in the business of providing a service
> including the devices, I suggested some rewording of the questions.
>> Bill Wagner
>>>> *From:* wims-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:wims-bounces at pwg.org] *On Behalf Of *Ira
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:41 PM
> *To:* wims at pwg.org; Ira McDonald
> *Subject:* [WIMS] Draft of MPSA Power article/survey (28 Nov 2010)
>> I just posted a slightly revised third draft of the December MPSA PWG
> Power Management article (w/ survey questions at the end) at:
>>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/white/mpsa-pwg-power-article-dec-2010-v3.doc>> I changed the "Tech support..." use case per Andrew's comments (which my MS
> Word 2007 didn't complain about in grammar-check) and cleaned up wording
> in several other paragraphs.
>> I would like to give this to Jim Fitzpatrick by THIS Tuesday at the latest,
> publication in the Monday 5 December MPSA newsletter.
>> Any last comments?
> - Ira
>>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
> Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
>http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc> mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com> Christmas through April:
> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
> May to Christmas:
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...