attachment

Melinda, et al: We are opposed to removing the "base level" from the CSS Print Profile.  We believe retaining the base level set of functions is necessary for the ultra-low end products.   *************************************************************************** Don Wright                     don@lexmark.com                                f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org Director of Standards Lexmark International          INCITS Executive Board Vice-Chair C14/082-3                      IEEE SA Standards Board Past Chair 740 New Circle Rd              IEEE SASB Patent Committee Chair   Lexington, Ky 40550            Member: IEEE SA Board of Governors 859-825-4808 (phone)           Member: IEEE CS SAB & W3C AC 603-963-8352 (fax)             Director, IEEE-ISTO ***************************************************************************   <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td> <td>"Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com> Sent by: owner-xp@pwg.org 09/13/2006 09:24 PM <td>                To:        <xp@pwg.org>         cc:                 Subject:        XP> [CSS Print]</table> The CSS Print specification currently defines two levels of support: a 'base' level, and an 'enhanced' level.   So far as I know, only the enhanced level of support has been deployed in the market.  I'm wondering if there is any point in keeping the definition of the base level.  That is, it will be extra work and I question the justification.   Does anyone feel it is important to maintain the base level of functionality in future versions of the CSS Print specification?  If not, I plan to remove it in an upcoming release.   Please raise any objections or express support by responding here or on <a href="mailto:www-style@w3.org">www-style@w3.org</a> by September 23.   Best wishes,   Melinda  _____ HP  -   Melinda Grant Connectivity Standards Consumer Printing and Imaging +1 (541) 582-3681 melinda.grant@hp.com    _____