Thanks and Regards,
From: Colin Whitby-Strevens [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 1998 2:39 AM
To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: P1394> EMAIL Poll
Any restrictions or guidance on who can vote? For example, I have been
following the interesting debate, but I have not participated in any pwg
meetings. Am I eligible? Or does the self-certification rule ("anyone who feels
they are technically qualified") apply?
With best wishes
> During the 1394 PWG 2/23 telecon, it was suggested we undertake an non-bindin
> g email poll to
> gauge interest in various proposals being considered by the working group.
> Please forward your reply to the 1394 PWG reflector - email@example.com
> If possible, please reply by Friday, February 27th, 1998.
> Greg LeClair
> PS> If you have suggestions for this or future polls, please send them under
> a different
> subject line.
> 1. Please rank the following proposals according to your interest level
> using the following scale ( 10 = High level
> of interest vs. 0 = No interest).
> ( ) 1284.4 Over Data FIFO Architecture (DFA)
> ( ) 1284.4 Over SBP-2
> ( ) Direct Printing Protocol - (current PWG-C proposal 0.71)
> ( ) SBP-2 Native - (current PWG proposal 0.1c)
> ( ) Other (describe)__________________
> 2. Please provide background comments on your ranking.
> Why do you prefer to use the given solution?
> Why should others consider the given solution?
> Does the the given solution meet the existing requirements?
> What issues are you aware of (if any) with the given solution?
> What is your opinion on the best way to move the discussion forward?
> Other comments?
-- Colin Whitby-Strevens email:firstname.lastname@example.org SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics tel: +44 1454 611500 1000, Aztec West fax: +44 1454 617910 Almondsbury BRISTOL BS32 4SQ UK