>I want to ask the working group one more time do we really want
>to move this MIB forward to a Draft Standard.
I guess I'll be first to stick my neck out and say I lean toward remain=
Proposed in order to deliver the enhancements sooner. The only benefit =
see going to Draft is if there are Printer, Printer Software and/or OS/=
who will not adopt the Printer MIB unless it is Draft. If this sentimen=
I hope it will be expressed in response to this topic.
Likewise, would it be more expedient for the HR MIB to embrace it's
in a similar fashion... remaining at Proposed? I would still like to se=
additional hrPrinterDetectedErrorState bits align with our updated MIB!=
In general, it appears the IETF is less interested in playing a major r=
standardizing MIBs, these days. They've basically refused to consider t=
which leads me to believe they have relegated all future standard MIBs =
the status of Proposed or Informational.
Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems