PMP Mail Archive: Re: PMP> Additions from Fujitsu (fwd)

PMP Mail Archive: Re: PMP> Additions from Fujitsu (fwd)

Re: PMP> Additions from Fujitsu (fwd)

Tom Hastings (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Fri, 18 Sep 1998 12:36:11 PDT

I would like to see the answers to Ron's good questions before approving
these registration proposals. Perhaps because Fujitsu wants to identify
the BPP and CU-DEV protocols specifically? Could a device support both
BPP and chPortTCP(37), so that it would be important to have both as
separate enums?

Also I agree that there should be a reference to the documentation.

Tom

At 18:18 09/14/98 PDT, Ron Bergman wrote:
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:12:52 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
>From: Ron Bergman <rbergma@dpc.com>
>To: lpyoung@lexmark.com
>Cc: pmp@unspecified-domain, pwg.org@unspecified-domain,
> yosimura@cp.cs.fujitsu.co.jp
>Subject: Re: PMP> Additions from Fujitsu
>
>Lloyd,
>
>Some questions for Fujitsu.
>
>For the two TCP Ports, is there a reason why chPortTCP(37) or
>chBiDirPortTCP(38) cannot be used? Were these port numbers assigned by
>IANA? Are the port numbers fixed or variable?
>
>I thought that one of our rules for new Interpreter Languages was that "a
>reference to the language documentation must be provided." Also, language
>is spelled incorrectly (languedge).
>
> Ron Bergman
> Dataproducts Corp.
>
>
>On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 lpyoung@lexmark.com wrote:
>
>> I have received the following request from Fujitsu:
>>
>> 1. Add the following to PrtChannelTypeTC
>>
>> chFJBPP
>> --FUJITSU LIMITED
>> --Business Printer Protocol(BPP)
>> --TCP Port 9313
>>
>>
>> 2. Add the following to PrtChannelTypeTC
>>
>> chFJCU-DEV
>> --FUJITSU LIMITED
>> --ControlUnit-DEVice(CU-DEV)
>> --TCP Port 747
>>
>> 3. Add the following to PrtInterpreterLangFamilyTC
>>
>> langFUJITSU
>> --FUJITSU Printer languedge
>>
>> If there are no comments by Friday 9/18 then I will add them to the current
>> draft.
>>
>> Lloyd
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>