>[Note, however, the latest draft I have 11-02-98, which uses the BITS
>construct incorrectly: the bit names are still listed in the DESCRIPTION,
>rather than externally a la enums. I haven't paid close enough attention
>to know if there is a later draft.]
You are correct. It needs to be fixed. However, I believe the
current spec is still syntactically correct according to the SMI and
the MIB compiler Im using.