Ira McDonald wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> Because it's in a trap binding and later SMIv2 (RFC 190x and RFC 257x,
> now Internet Standard) say it has to be 'accessible-for-notify'
> which in turn translates to earlier SMIv2 (RFC 144x) or SMIv1
> (RFC 1212) not at all (there was no such access defined). Therefore,
> at my suggestion the Printer MIB v2 draft changed the object to
> 'read-only' (the same private edit I'm convinced every vendor
> has made to the MIB if they had to compile with newer SMIv2
> If you want exact chapter and verse, I'll find the sections
> in the SMI specs, but it's all there for the finding...
> - Ira McDonald (outside consultant at Xerox)
> High North Inc