PMP Mail Archive: RE: RE: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMark

PMP Mail Archive: RE: RE: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMark

RE: RE: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMarkerIndex

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 15:21:17 EDT

  • Next message: Ron Bergman: "PMP> Number 9 Envelope Size"

    Hi Andreas,

    No just three Markers and use internal knowledge to map
    them to Interpreters (and probably state it in the
    'prtInterpreterDescription' object for each Interpreter).

    Cheers,
    - Ira McDonald

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Schoenbach Andreas [mailto:Andreas.Schoenbach@abgap.siemens.de]
    Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 8:06 AM
    To: pmp@pwg.org
    Subject: RE: RE: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMarkerIndex

    Thanks, for your suggestions.

    I have 4 interpreters and 3 marker. I will thus create 12 instances in the
    prtInterpreterTable. -> O.K.

    Do I need now 12 instances in the prtMarkerTable (with same index)?

    Or sufficient 3 and I know
    prtInterpreterIndex => prtMarkerIndex
    1,4,7,10 => 1
    2,5,8,11 => 2
    3,4,9,12 => 3
    ???

    -Andreas

            -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
            Von: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
            Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 20. September 2000 21:51
            An: 'Wagner,William'; 'Schoenbach Andreas'; pmp@pwg.org
            Betreff: RE: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMarkerIndex

            Hi,

            Thanks Bill - right - use multiple instances of (for
            instance) a PostScript interpreter to represent each
            different Marker - good solution.

            Cheers,
            - Ira McDonald

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Wagner,William [mailto:bwagner@digprod.com]
            Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:00 AM
            To: 'Schoenbach Andreas'; pmp@pwg.org
            Subject: RE: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMarkerIndex

            Greetings:

            The MIB model assumes that the channel drives the interpreter and
    the
            interpreter somehow drives the marker through the system controller.
    There
            is a relationship between channel and interpreter(s) in the
            prtChannelCurrentJobCntlLangIndex, and the
            prtChannelDefaultPageDescLangIndex objects. You could define
    interpreters
            with a fixed relationship to each marking engine. This would allow
    the
            dynamic relation between channel and marking engine to be reported.

            William A. Wagner (Bill Wagner)
            Director of Technology
            Imaging Division
            NETsilicon, Inc.
            781-398-4588

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Schoenbach Andreas
    [mailto:Andreas.Schoenbach@abgap.siemens.de]
            Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:11 AM
            To: pmp@pwg.org
            Subject: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMarkerIndex

            Hello,

            I have three markers and two channels in my machine.

            I need to select which marker is printing the data from a channel.

            (like prtChannelDefaultPageDescLangIndex).

            Is this relation present or can you extend the mib?

            Example:

            prtChannelMarkerIndex OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX Integer32
                MAX-ACCESS read-write
                STATUS current
                DESCRIPTION
                    "The value of prtMarkerIndex corresponding to the
                     Marker for this channel.
                    This marker defines the default marker to be used for the
    print
            data
                     from this channel.
                    Must be 1 or greater. -1 means unknown. -2 means auto-select
    "
                ::= { prtChannelEntry 11 }

            Thanks,
            Andreas.Schoenbach@abgap.siemens.de



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 15:33:23 EDT