From: Harry Lewis (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2008 - 17:30:16 EDT
I accessed the archived report on Port Mon MIB interop testing which
Discussion of use of Community Name
Must be “public” for Port Monitor MIB to work
MS indicated that the Community Name at the logical port level is needed
to be compatible with the existing applications.
Is it correct to interpret this as "MS needs the Community Name" and "the
Community Name must be "public"?
Program Manager - Intellectual Property & Open Standards
P Think before you print
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 17:30:29 EDT