PMP Mail Archive: Re: PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name

Re: PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name

From: Ron.Bergman@ricoh-usa.com
Date: Tue Aug 05 2008 - 17:56:19 EDT

  • Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name"

    Harry,

    A more appropriate interpretation would be:

    "SNMP needs the Community Name" and "for MS the Community Name must be
    "public" for the Port Mon MIB"

                                                                               
                 Harry Lewis
                 <harryl@us.ibm.co
                 m> To
                 Sent by: PMP@pwg.org
                 pmp-owner@pwg.org cc
                                                                               
                                                                       Subject
                 08/05/2008 02:30 PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name
                 PM
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               

    I accessed the archived report on Port Mon MIB interop testing which
    says...

    Discussion of use of Community Name
    Must be “public” for Port Monitor MIB to work
    MS indicated that the Community Name at the logical port level is needed to
    be compatible with the existing applications.

    Is it correct to interpret this as "MS needs the Community Name" and "the
    Community Name must be "public"?

    Regards,
    Harry

    Harry Lewis
    Program Manager - Intellectual Property & Open Standards
    Phone: 303-924-5337
    e-mail: harryl@us.ibm.com
    infoprint.com

    (Embedded image moved to file: pic04734.gif)
    P Think before you print


    pic04734.gif

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 17:56:28 EDT