[IPP] HP Inc. has reviewed the IPP 3D specification and has comments

[IPP] HP Inc. has reviewed the IPP 3D specification and has comments

Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) smith.kennedy at hp.com
Thu Dec 8 16:57:25 UTC 2016


I admit it can be rather annoying to fix this. 😊 I won't object if #5 is rejected.

Smith



> On Dec 8, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> FWIW - I second Mike's comments about internal links.  For the IPP
> System Service, this would affect several hundred references.
> 
> Cheers,
> - Ira
> 
> 
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic <http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>
> http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc <http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>
> mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com <mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
> Jan-April: 579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
> May-Dec: PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com <mailto:msweet at apple.com>> wrote:
> Smith,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback.  Looking through the comments, I'm not sure how to (simply, easily) resolve #5 - Word's support for internal hyperlinks is poor, and trying to get it to select only the bracketed name ("[FOO]") in the 79 places I'd need to do this isn't something I want to do unless people see this as necessary.  For the record, in the history of the PWG I think your implementor's guide is the only specification we have ever produced that had such internal links...
> 
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:02 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com <mailto:smith.kennedy at hp.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> Here are a number of points of feedback on the IPP 3D Printing extensions draft in PWG Last Call (http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipp3d10-20161114.pdf <http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipp3d10-20161114.pdf>) - apologies that I haven't submitted these earlier:
>> 
>> Page 10, line 267: "extrude ABS and/or PLA filaments" might be better phrased as "extrude filaments of ABS, PLA, or other substances"
>> Page 10, line 271: "Discovery of 3D Printers is based on..." perhaps should be "Discovery of IPP 3D Printers is based on..."
>> Page 12, section 2.5: the URL highlighting seems to be inconsistent - only one is in blue with an underline
>> Page 12, section 2.5: 3MF isn't listed here as an organization, but ought to be?
>> Page 13, line 347 / 350 / 352 / etc.: The reference doesn't seem to be a bookmark that can take the reader to the reference listing
>> Page 13, line 357: PDF isn't listed as an existing specification
>> Page 13, line 358: "...document should define IPP attributes..." changed to be "...document defines IPP attributes..."
>> Page  22, line 559: "DNS-SD based Discovery" might instead be "DNS-SD for service advertisement and discovery". Also, not quite sure why "Discovery" is capitalized here...
>> Page 22, line 573: Some weird pagination stuff going on - lines 574-576 should be on page 22, and Table 2 should be on possibly page 22 or maybe page 23. But all the whitespace on page 23 seems to be a formatting glitch.
>> Page 24, line 586: "ASSIGN OID HERE"? Is it time to assign the OID?
>> Page 25, line 603: Should "[RFC3510] and IPP-USB [IPP-USB]" be "[RFC3510] and/or IPP-USB [IPP-USB]"?
>> Page 34, line 729: If "materials-key" is required, then "printer-strings-uri" should also be required, but it isn't listed in table 5 / section 6.5
>> Page 35, line 759: If "materials-key" is required, then "printer-strings-uri" should also be required, but it isn't listed in table 5 / section 6.5
>> Page 44, line 979: Is there any requirement as to the document format of the images available at this URI?
>> Page 54, section 13.4: Shouldn't the 3MF Consortium be handing the registration of the "media/3mf" media type?
>> Page 54, line 1338: The type name "media/3mf" isn't consistent with the type name listed in table 2 ("model/3mf"). Which is correct?
>> Thanks for the hard work, Mike and all contributors!
>> 
>> Smith
>> 
>> /**
>>     Smith Kennedy
>>     Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS
>>     Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB IF
>>     Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
>>     HP Inc.
>> */
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20161208/eb9dcb56/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4241 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20161208/eb9dcb56/attachment.p7s>


More information about the ipp mailing list