Probably not :) I'll see if I still have that…
On Sep 25, 2012, at 11:00 AM, "Petrie, Glen" <glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com> wrote:
>> Did you see Pete's note called "[Cloud] How different is Cloud Print from our currently defined Print Service" from Sun 8/26/2012 5:58 AM
>>> From: cloud-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Randy Turner
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:56 AM
> To: cloud at pwg.org> Subject: Re: [Cloud] Minutes posted from today's concall
>>> Exactly…that was my thinking as well.
>> When we move a print service from a "local" network to "The Cloud", it really becomes a network transport and AAA problem, which seems a separate realm from the PWG semantic model.
>> I would think there would be no impact on a "job ticket"
>> I think this may be the case that Bill W. mentioned in a previous email….for a lack of another group to take up the job ticket work, this work was relegated to the cloud group -- I think I remember something about it, but from a schedule perspective, I'm assuming that the two efforts (cloud and job ticket) are separate, and that it's possible to advance one without the other.
>>> On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-09-24, at 6:26 PM, Randy Turner <rturner at amalfisystems.com> wrote:
>> Regarding your earlier email statement (above), I was under the impression that there was nothing that needed to be "adapted". Meaning, we would like a Cloud printer to behave pretty much the same way we would any other print service (like on an internal enterprise network). This was based on a discussion at the last face-to-face meeting ( I believe ).
>> From the Client perspective, this remains to be the case. Client prints to Cloud service and that service looks just like a printer.
>> However, the Cloud to Printer interface is different than we've supported before, mainly because we want a firewall/router-friendly interface and not something that needs to be "punched" through to allow for communications.
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...