[Cloud] More PWG and GCP

[Cloud] More PWG and GCP

[Cloud] More PWG and GCP

Petrie, Glen glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com
Tue Mar 19 21:33:36 UTC 2013



Creating 'levels' of the PWG:PJT was not the needed response to Google
at this time (but the 'levels' may still have a need in future); so, I
decided to follow up on Michael feedback to the Google team which
represented the needed initial feedback. 


Today, I 'refactored' GCP 2.0 into what I call GCP 2.PWG.   It attempts
to refactor GCP 2.0 elements and values to PWG while addressing
(hopefully all or most of) the concerns Michael identified.    To make a
simple mapping/comparison, I used Google's ProtoBuf notation (for those
who don't write code, sorry) which is how Google wrote GCP 2.0.   There
were, I discovered, some interesting mapping changes and some
simplifications.  Since I am new using ProtoBufs, there may be one or
two minor errors. 


I hope that members of the Google team review and consider some of the
refactored GCP 2.0.


There is no inline or other documentation or notes but should be


A possible next step is to use the 'PWG:PJT Level 1' to add other
elements and values that may be important at this time.  In addition
provide definition of terms using PWG specifications and standards. 


[note: enum's in the GCP 2.PWG map directly to enum's I have made in my
c-code; so I believe the refactoring is doable at this time.]






This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20130319/6285ebf5/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the cloud mailing list