One minor suggestion Joe. It appears that the MPSA sets up the survey as a
separate entity rather than attached to the article. I suggest rewording the
last sentence of the first group from:
To help the PWG support the print industry at all levels, include Managed
Print Service, with a fully responsive set of MFD security standards, a set
of survey questions can be found at the end of article.
to:
To allow the PWG to present the hardcopy device security needs of users to
tool suppliers as well as device manufacturers, and to help the PWG support
the print industry with a fully responsive set of MFD security standards, it
is important that members of the MPSA respond to the NAC survey associated
with this article.
Thanks,
Bill Wagner
From: ids-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ids-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock,
Joe
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:32 PM
To: ids at pwg.org
Subject: [IDS] Latest draft of MPSA article
This one incorporates the last set of edits and suggestion. Thanks to all.
Send me you comments.
Given the level of comment n the last version, I don't think we need to
review this at Thursday's WIMS conference call.
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/white/MPSA-Hardcopy-Security-Article-draft-4.d
ocx
Joe
---------------------------------------
Joe Murdock
Principal Engineer and Researcher
Co-Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security
Sharp Labs of America
5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd
Camas, WA 98607
(360) 817-7542
jmurdock at sharplabs.com
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ids/attachments/20101102/58b881b7/attachment-0001.html>