At 16:41 29/10/99 -0500, Richard Shockey wrote:
>One of my proposed agenda items is charter bashing so here is a modest
>revision of the previous charter with new Milestones.
>>Comments ARE appreciated.
A couple came to mind...
>Non-Repudiable Proof of Delivery (Receipt Notification).
"Non-repudiation" seems to be something of a rathole (see PKIX discussions)
-- I suggest that references be dropped. E.g. the above is statd as:
#Proof of Delivery (Receipt Notification).
>Proposed solutions:
>>Proposed solutions should not impose undue burdens on implementers in order
>that the protocol should be available on a wide variety of devices and
systems.
>>The group will take note of other areas within the IETF that may have
>direct bearing on reliable document delivery.
>>Relevant areas include:
>>- Security, Authentication and Encryption (TLS, etc)
>- Sender Identification (vCard)
>- RFC 2301 File Formats
>- Digital Signatures and Certificates
Also?
- RESCAP
- IMPP
- ENUM
>Goals and Milestones:
>>Feb 2000 : Submit Internet Draft of Goals and Objectives for Quality
>Document Distribution or submit addendum to RFC 2542 (Goals and Terminology
>for Internet Fax)
Haven't we already done this? Do you mean "Submit ... for publication as
informational RFC?
>June 2000 : Submit Internet Draft for Quality Document Distribution Gateway
>Services (Based on Selected Protocols)
How long is a piece of string? Gateway to *what*?
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
(GK at ACM.ORG)