Sender ID, timestamps and watermarks

Sender ID, timestamps and watermarks

Graham Klyne GK at Dial.pipex.com
Tue Feb 9 07:48:33 EST 1999


At 10:24 08/02/99 -0700, Nick Webb wrote:
>
>>On the subject of timestamp, I think the only one we have to be concerned
>with in a >wire protocol is the date/time of sending.  All other timestamps
>are provided by the >receiver and hence are local implementation issues.
>
>I agree, but at the risk of flogging this one to death - do you mean that
>the sender only sends date/time from his perspective and does not need to
>pass timezone information to the receiver?

I didn't mean to prejudge that issue.

I personally think that it would be appropriate for an Internet protocol to
pass timezone information.  But I think we must also recognize that if the
message arrives via an onramp then that information might be unavailable
(though an auxiliary gateway timestamp with timezone might be also included).

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK at ACM.ORG)




More information about the Ifx mailing list