How about
"The transmission and reception of documents rendered in their
ORIGINAL form
is an essential global communications service."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Shockey [SMTP:rshockey at ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 10:37 AM
> To: Michael Crawford; 'Nick Webb'
> Cc: ifx at pwg.org> Subject: RE: Questions to be addressed...
>>> >> Right, and many lawyers I've dealt with (here in CA) are happy to fax
> me
> >> something but rarely agree to email me anything important. It's part of
> >> that unmodifiable requirement Richard mentioned earlier.
> >>
> > *** I see your point on "unmodifiable". I guess I need to bone up
> >on VCARD and see how this applies...I thought VCARD only authenticated my
> signature,
> >not the content of my message...
>> vCard RFC2425 and RFC2426 are not "digital signatures" they are a
> identity exchange format that is very popular in the email world to
> exchange "human friendly" address data such as phone, fax, street address,
> company, title etc.
>> Digital signatures require trusted authorities to issue the proper
> certificates etc, verifying the content of the message usually involves
> some checksum calculation against the Content Object that is presented to
> the recipient by the sender.
>> As for the class of transactions here.. how about this for a first line of
> the charter.
>> "The transmission and reception of documents rendered in their final form
> is an essential global communications service."
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Richard Shockey
> Shockey Consulting LLC
> 8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
> St. Louis, MO 63119
> Voice 314.918.9020
> Fax 314.918.9015
> INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey at ix.netcom.com> eFAX 815.333.1237
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<