> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Shockey [SMTP:rshockey at ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 3:42 PM
> To: Michael Crawford; 'harryl at us.ibm.com'; Michael Crawford
> Cc: ifx at pwg.org> Subject: RE: Word docs
>> Oh. Thanks, I missed out on the underlying assumption.
I agree store and forward is a valid fallback for IPP and really
have no problem with that.
Can we make sure we document this assumption somewhere in OUR
documentation (this discussion group's work...i.e. the charter we are
working on?). Something like "...devices with full time connection to the
Internet". That will help others figure out that this is not the right IPP
subset to be used for their devices.
> > c. Do we want to instead require an IPP enabled Internet fax be
> online
> >at all times (thereby being called a fulltime fax) or are there other
> solutions
>> This is a underlying assumtion I'm suprised you havent picked up. For the
> IPP server to recieve the transaction it must be connected to the
> Internet.
>> If you are someone who is usually disconnected from the internet then SMTP
> is more appropriate.
>> That said it is possible to gateway from IPP to either SMTP or the GSTN
> ..but we that is the second phase of work.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Richard Shockey
> Shockey Consulting LLC
> 8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
> St. Louis, MO 63119
> Voice 314.918.9020
> Fax 314.918.9015
> INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey at ix.netcom.com> eFAX 815.333.1237
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<