Iwazaki-san,
Thank you for your review and comments.
Please see our responses below.
Regards,
Lloyd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryuji Iwazaki [mailto:iwa at rdl.toshibatec.co.jp]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:19 PM
> To: McIntyre, Lloyd; 'Yoshio YOSHIURA'
> Subject: Re: TIFF-FX Extension 1
>>> McIntyre-san,
> I have reviewed section E1.3.
> In page18,
> > d) The Section 7.2.1. "Baseline Fields" XResolution and Yresolution
> > fields now read:
> >
> > XResolution(282) = 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, 1200.
> RATIONAL
> > YResolution(283) = 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, 1200.
> RATIONAL
> > The resolution of the image is expressed in pixels per
> resolution
> > unit. In pixels per inch, allowed XResolution values
> are: 100, 200,
> > 300, 400, 600 and 1200. The lossless color fax profile
> requires the
> > pixels to be square, hence YResolution SHALL equal
> XResolution. Base
> > resolution is 200 pixels per inch.
>> There are no NOTEs such as page 17.
> I think it is better to add the following sentense.
>> See Section 2.2.2 for inch-metric equivalency.
>> Is it needed to add the note which describes limitation of
> combinations?
Your are correct. Our proposal is to add the following note:
NOTE: For inch-metric equivalency and legal combinations of
YResolution and XResolution, see the two notes of Profile C
YResolution and XResolution (i.e. the notes of item C above).
> There is no such note in section 7.2.1 of RFC2301.
A similar note may be considered.
NOTE: For inch-metric equivalency and legal combinations of
YResolution and XResolution, see the two notes of Profile C
Section 6.2.1 YResolution and XResolution.
>>> In page18,
> >
> +---------------------------+--------------------------------+
> > | YResolution | 98**, 100, 196**, 200,
> 300, |
> > | | 400, 600, 800, 1200
> |
> > | | (written in
> pixels/inch) |
> >
> +---------------------------+--------------------------------+
>> There is no value 391.
> Please add this value.
Done.
>> Regards,
>> Ryuji Iwazaki
> TOSHIBA TEC Corporation
>>