I would have no problem with PDF. Unless there is very strong support
shown for that on the reflector, however, I am also interested in Ron's
IPP proposal.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
"Gail Songer" <gsonger at peerless.com>
Sent by: owner-ifx at pwg.org
05/09/2002 11:08 AM
To: ifx at pwg.org
cc:
Subject: IFX> TIFFFx
Hi,
During the last meeting, we had a very long discussion regarding TIFF-FX,
Adobe and IPPFax. We agreed that it was at least time to consider
alternatives to TIFF-FX. We also wrote a note to Adobe explaining what we
intended to do with TIFF-FX and asked for their comments. To date, we
have
not heard back from them.
Ron Bergman volunteered to draw up a proposal providing an IPP solution to
identify the compression schemes used in the job. He has indicated that
he
will have something ready for the Portland meeting. Another alternative
proposed was to use PDF as the required PDL.
I would like to get some feed back from the group. What do you think of
the alternatives?
a) Stick it out with TIFF-FX
b) Use an IPP solution (or would prefer to wait until the proposal has
been
given)
c) Use PDF
d) other (please specify)
Gail