I strongly agree with Roger on having a straw proposal to work from.
Bob and Randy,
Can you two produce such a straw proposal with issues listed?
Thanks,
Tom
At 06:55 05/21/97 PDT, Roger K Debry wrote:
>I would be interested in such a meeting, but would strongly
>suggest that we all have a straw proposal to work from. I
>find meeting much more productive if we have a documented
>proposal to work from and a specific set of issues to work on.
>>At this point I have no preference for dates.
>>Roger K deBry
>Senior Techncial Staff Member
>Architecture and Technology
>IBM Printing Systems
>email: rdebry at us.ibm.com>phone: 1-303-924-4080
>>>---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 05/21/97 07:45
>AM ---------------------------
>> BLDVMA.GEBERT @ D03AU003
> 05/20/97 06:04 PM
>Please respond to BLDVMA.GEBERT @ VM
>>>To: Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM, Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM
>cc:
>Subject: IPP>PRO future face-to-face meeting
>>***********************************************************
>SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
> I could not believe this note. Those guys must have absolutely
> nothing to do and absolutely no regard for other people's time
> if they want to schedule a meeting between already very frequent
> meetings. From my experience with their conf calls, they should
> try to find a higher degree of focus, rather than calling more
> meetings. I am very appreciative of the fact that you have
> more patience with this cooperative process. I would not be
> able to sit through 10 minutes of their meetings!
>> Hopefully they will at a minimum have a conf room with a phone
> able to tie in other people who will only want to hear a small
> fraction of the uninteresting discussions and get the few
> useful pieces. Steve.
>>*** Forwarding note from SMTP3 --IINUS1 05/20/97 17:47 ***
>=========================================================================
>Received: from lists.underscore.com by vnet.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with
>TCP;
> Tue, 20 May 97 19:47:29 EDT
>Received: from localhost (daemon at localhost) by lists.underscore.com
>(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA25541; Tue, 20 May 1997 19:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Tue, 20 May 1997 19:45:57 -0400
>Received: (from daemon at localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
>TAA25399 for ipp-outgoing; Tue, 20 May 1997 19:42:09 -0400 (EDT)
>Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 16:44:05 -0700
>From: Robert.Herriot at Eng.Sun.COM (Robert Herriot)
>Message-Id: <199705202344.QAA02587 at woden.eng.sun.com>
>To: ipp at pwg.org>Subject: IPP>PRO future face-to-face meeting
>X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
>Sender: ipp-owner at pwg.org>>>Randy and I talked about having a face-to-face meeting in June before the
>Boston meeting in order to work out details of the protocol. We
>believe that we need to wrap up most loose ends by the June meeting
>in Boston.
>>The location would likely be in the San Francisco Bay area, possibly
>at Sun, and the likely meeting dates would be Tuesday June 10 or
>Wednesday June 11.
>>If you are interested in attending such a meeting, please let me
>know whether such dates would work for you and indicate your preference
>for June 10 or 11.
>>Bob Herriot
>>>>>