I've posted 3 versions of the .pdf file: black revisions, red revisions,
and no revisions.
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/
-rw-r--r-- 1 pwg pwg 86940 Jul 10 16:47 ipp970708-rev-red.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 pwg pwg 91136 Jul 9 02:57 ipp970708-rev.doc
-rw-r--r-- 1 pwg pwg 85064 Jul 10 16:47 ipp970708-rev.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 pwg pwg 319415 Jul 9 02:58 ipp970708-rev.ps
-rw-r--r-- 1 pwg pwg 78848 Jul 9 02:57 ipp970708.doc
-rw-r--r-- 1 pwg pwg 70055 Jul 10 16:48 ipp970708.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 pwg pwg 223414 Jul 9 02:57 ipp970708.ps
Tom
At 20:10 07/08/97 PDT, Robert Herriot wrote:
>>I have made a few revisions to the IPP protocol document based on feedback.
>The protocol has not changed -- only the explanation has. Hopefully
>it is clearer now.
>>The documents that I have downloaded are:
>>Without revision marks:
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/ipp970708.doc>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/ipp970708.ps>>With revision marks relative to the July 2 version.
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/ipp970708-rev.doc>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_PRO/ipp970708-rev.ps>>Hopefully, enough of you will have looked over the changes
>that we can review the new one without revisions marks.
>>If someone can produce a pdf or txt version, I would appreciate it.
>BTW, I forgot to change the date in the document. It still says July 2.
>>Bob Herriot
>>