IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking

IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking

Paul Moore paulmo at microsoft.com
Fri Jul 24 14:33:19 EDT 1998


I dont see where it says that a server must support chunking. It says I must
support 1.1. Maybe I am reading it wrong (I guess thats why we have
bake-offs)

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Turner, Randy [SMTP:rturner at sharplabs.com]
> Sent:	Friday, July 24, 1998 10:48 AM
> To:	'ipp at pwg.org'
> Subject:	RE: IPP> Implementation question re.:  chunking
> 
> 
> Well, I'm assuming since we "last-call'd" these documents in the WG,
> that everybody is in agreement that an implementation that doesn't
> support chunking isn't compliant.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 		-----Original Message-----
> 		From:	Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo at microsoft.com]
> 		Sent:	Friday, July 24, 1998 10:25 AM
> 		To:	'Randy Turner'; Carl Kugler
> 		Cc:	ipp at pwg.org
> 		Subject:	RE: IPP> Implementation question re.:
> chunking
> 
> 		You might find that some implementations dont support
> chunking.
> 
> 		> -----Original Message-----
> 		> From:	Randy Turner [SMTP:rturner at sharplabs.com]
> 		> Sent:	Friday, July 24, 1998 10:05 AM
> 		> To:	Carl Kugler
> 		> Cc:	ipp at pwg.org
> 		> Subject:	Re: IPP> Implementation question re.:
> chunking
> 		> 
> 		> At 04:51 PM 7/24/98 +0000, you wrote:
> 		> >draft-ietf-ipp-protocol-06.txt says the client and
> server MUST support
> 		> the
> 		> "chunked" transfer encoding when receiving.  My
> question is:  Can we count
> 		> on this?  I.e., if our client always transmits
> requests using the
> 		> "chunked"
> 		> transfer encoding, will we be able to interoperate
> with the vast majority
> 		> of IPP server implementations?
> 		> >
> 		> >    -Carl
> 		> 
> 		> 
> 		> There are no vast majority of IPP server
> implementations (yet). I think
> 		> the
> 		> only worry is if someone plans to deploy IPP behind a
> generic web server
> 		> that doesn't support chunking. However, Apache and
> most other of the more
> 		> popular HTTP/1.1 servers will support this. It should
> definitely be a
> 		> bullet item (checkoff item) at the upcoming bake-off,
> however.
> 		> 
> 		> Randy
> 		> 
> 		> > 



More information about the Ipp mailing list