<html>
<font size=3D3>I have assumed that 'client-error-bad-request' is the
correct response for
an unknown or unsupported attribute with 'uri' syntax . Though I
think that
we should make 'client-error-bad-request' be the response for a
document-uri that is too long as well because a length error is a low
level
error which is likely to be detected out of the context of a particular
attribute. So I see no value in making a special exception for one
attribute's length error.
Comment?
Bob Herriot
At 11:59 AM 5/11/98 , Carl Kugler wrote:
>If the case of an unknown or unsupported attribute with 'uri' syntax
that fails
>the length (<=3D 1023) check, does the Printer return
>'client-error-request-uri-too-long' or 'client-error-bad-request'?=A0
Reading
>section 15.3, I get the impression that the
'client-error-request-uri-too-long'
>only applies to the "document-uri" attribute.=A0 And in the
particular case of
>>unknown or unsupported attribute
>IF the attribute syntax supplied by the client is supported but the
length is
>not legal for that attribute syntax, REJECT/RETURN
'client-error-bad-request'.
>>=A0 -Carl
> </font>
</html>