>>> See my comments under,
>> >> My opinion is that the second proposal must be the right solution
> >> I.e.
> >> >attr-tag=value-tag-keyword
> >> >attr-name='requested-attributes'
> >> >attr-value='printer-info'
> >> >attr-value='printer-location'
> >>
> >> Then we have a consistent. When the requested attribute is
> >> 'requested-attributes'
> >> and the values e.g are 'printer-info' and 'printer-location', then I
> think,
> >> the IPP Printer should return the value it doesn't support. The same
> >> behavior as other
> >> attribute with unsupported attributes.
> >>
> >> /HOLST
> >>
>> >In general, I agree that this is the right solution. However, I'm
> concerned about the example >given. I don't know what language it's in,
> but in IPP the syntax tag is applies to an individual >attribute value, not
> a whole attribute. So it should be rewritten as
>> > attr-name='requested-attributes'
> > value-tag=keyword
> > attr-value='printer-info'
> > value-tag=keyword
> > attr-value='printer-location'
>>> I don't understand your concern about the language, because the values of
> the 'requested-attributes' is of the type 1setOfKeyword. A value with a
> 'keyword' type must
> be in en-us language and ascii character set. In the above example the
> response would
> in details looks like,
>> value-tag=1setOfKeyword
> name-length=0x0014
> name='requested-attributes'
> value-length=0x000c
> value='printer-info'
> value-tag=1setOfKeyword
> name-length=0x0000
> value-length=0x0010
> value='printer-location'
>> /HOLST
>
HOLST-
I like your new example much better. To be really picky, I would point out that there really is no such thing as a '1setOfKeyword' value-tag, only 'keyword'. Sorry to be so anal, I'm just striving for clarity here.
-Carl
>>>> >
> >
> >
> > In Savannah we agreed that in the operations get-job-attributes,
> get-jobs,
> > and get-printer-attributes, if the 'requested-attributes' attribute
> > contains values specifying attributes not supported by the printer, the
> > printer SHALL return status code
> > 'successful-ok-ignored-or-substituted-attributes' and MAY return these
> > attributes in the 'unsupported-attributes' group. My question is, if the
> > printer chooses to list the attributes as unsupported in the response,
> > which of the following formats should it use (suppose the printer doesn't
> > support 'printer-info' and 'printer-location'):
> >
> > attr-tag=value-tag-unsupported
> > attr-name='printer-info'
> > attr-value=NULL
> >
> > attr-tag=value-tag-unsupported
> > attr-name='printer-location'
> > attr-value=NULL
> >
> > - or -
> >
> > attr-tag=value-tag-keyword
> > attr-name='requested-attributes'
> > attr-value='printer-info'
> > attr-value='printer-location'
> >
> >
> > -Hugo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>>>> -----
> See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/ipp/?start=4550> --
> Free e-mail group hosting at http://www.eGroups.com/>>>>>
-----
See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/ipp/?start=4561
--
Free e-mail group hosting at http://www.eGroups.com/