Oh, well I guess I must have misinterpreted this line:
> 1) Problem: Add a way to have exceptions for a document copy that are
> different from other copies of the same document;
I read that as exceptions of one copy of a document in which all other
copies are the same. (Isn't that what "copy" means? Oh well.)
I would have thought there was some sort of official term for a
scenario that implies "Here's a file. Print it once using these attributes,
then print it another way, then print it another way..."
Thanks for the clarification.
...jay
don at lexmark.com wrote:
>> Jay:
>> It is a relatively common scenario from our customers who would like to submit a
> single print job and get:
>> 1) Single-sided hard copy as a master
> 2) Multi-up copy for reference and the file
> -- and --
> 3) A set of transparencies
>> Not all that rare.
>> **********************************************
> * Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
> * Chair, Printer Working Group *
> * Chair, IEEE MSC *
> * *
> * Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
> * Lexmark International *
> * 740 New Circle Rd *
> * Lexington, Ky 40550 *
> * 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
> **********************************************
>> jkm%underscore.com at interlock.lexmark.com on 02/07/2000 08:33:54 PM
>> To: Robert.Herriot%pahv.xerox.com at interlock.lexmark.com> cc: ipp%pwg.org at interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
> Subject: Re: IPP>EXC update for Document and Page Exceptions
>> "Herriot, Robert" wrote:
> >
> > 1) Problem: Add a way to have exceptions for a document copy that are
> > different from other copies of the same document;
>> Wow, does anyone have any real-world examples if this kind of problem?
> I mean, this looks to be something like 27 sigma away from the norm.
>> Perhaps I don't understand the problem at hand?
>> ...jay