IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

henrik.holst at i-data.com henrik.holst at i-data.com
Tue Feb 29 05:29:10 EST 2000




-
Hi think we should call them

"Job & Printer Administrative Operations"
"Device Administrative Operations"

And not mention anything about set2 and set3 operations.

Henrik




"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com> on 29-02-2000 00:27:47

To:   Ron Bergman <rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com>, Tom Hastings
      <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>, cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
cc:   ipp <ipp at pwg.org> (bcc: Henrik Holst/INT)

Subject:  IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents




Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
the title too, such as:

Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2

or:

Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2

and:

Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3

(or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
yet?)


For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:

Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations

Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
the mailing list.

Comments?

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
To: Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Subject: Set2 Operations


Tom,

This title is becoming extremely confusing.  I suggest it be changed to:

    Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2

And a similar change for set 3.

These titles appear to be more descriptive.  i.e. they are actually
*additional* operations, not *set* operations.

    Ron Bergman










More information about the Ipp mailing list