Hi think we should call them
"Job & Printer Administrative Operations"
"Device Administrative Operations"
And not mention anything about set2 and set3 operations.
"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com> on 29-02-2000 00:27:47
To: Ron Bergman <rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com>, Tom Hastings
<hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>, cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
cc: ipp <ipp at pwg.org> (bcc: Henrik Holst/INT)
Subject: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents
Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
the title too, such as:
Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2
Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2
Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3
(or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:
Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations
Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
the mailing list.
From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
To: Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Subject: Set2 Operations
This title is becoming extremely confusing. I suggest it be changed to:
Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2
And a similar change for set 3.
These titles appear to be more descriptive. i.e. they are actually
*additional* operations, not *set* operations.