IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?

IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?

IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?

Hastings, Tom N hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
Thu Mar 9 03:10:32 EST 2000


I agree that we should add the references to the [ipp-mod] Appendix on
Directory schema when we publish as RFCs working with the RFC Editor.

However, I've already updated the Set documents with the references as the
place where the "printer-xri-supported" (1setOf collection) is defined,
which is also a natural place.  

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl-Uno Manros [mailto:carl at manros.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 21:57
To: Hastings, Tom N; ipp
Subject: RE: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported"
definition to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?


Tom,

I suggest not.

If we want to reference them I think a better place for the reference would
be in the IPP/1.1 Model & Semantics document where we have a Directory
section. Maybe we can add that as an informational reference before it get
published as RFC.

Carl-Uno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipp at pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp at pwg.org]On Behalf Of Hastings,
> Tom N
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 6:17 PM
> To: ipp
> Subject: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to
> site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?
>
>
> Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition in the "Job and Printer
> Set operation spec to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?
>
> If so, I need the complete references to them.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>



More information about the Ipp mailing list