Exactly! As long as the OID is unique, what does it matter which part
of the tree it is in?
Bruce Greenblatt wrote:
>> What's wrong with continuing to use the one from Sun? As long as it is
> unambiguous, who cares?
>> At 11:59 AM 4/21/2000 -0600, harryl at us.ibm.com wrote:
> >The Internet Printing Protocol Working Group is developing an Internet
> >Draft describing an LDAP Schema for Printer Services.
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-ldap-printer-schema-00.txt> >
> >For expediency, the initial draft specifies OIDs from a Sun Microsystems
> >private enterprise subtree. In preparation for a standards track document
> >we would like these OIDs to be routed in a standards subtree. We want to
> >harmonize with any convention that may exist within the LDAP community for
> >registering this subtree. Will the LDAP group make the request for an
> >assigned OID subtree or would you prefer for the IPP group to make the
> >Harry Lewis
> Bruce Greenblatt, Ph. D.
> Directory Tools and Application Services, Inc.
>http://www.directory-applications.com> Sign up for our LDAP Technical Overview Seminar at: