IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement

IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement

IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement

kugler at us.ibm.com kugler at us.ibm.com
Fri Jun 23 10:58:25 EDT 2000



It's too bad the SEND, SOML, and SAML commands were OPTIONAL in RFC 821.
Otherwise, the existing SMTP infrastructure would also be an
instant-message infrastructure, useful for some kinds of notifications.

     -Carl


Jay Martin <jkm at underscore.com> on 06/22/2000 05:48:51 PM

Please respond to jkm at underscore.com

To:   Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
cc:   ipp at pwg.org
Subject:  Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement



kugler at us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> Now, if you want to expand INDP to "IntRAnet Notification Delivery
> Protocol", I'll buy that.

Amen, brother.  I remain surprised that a generalized Internet
notification protocol has not yet been developed, given that there
are *so* many useful applications that could use it.

     ...jay






More information about the Ipp mailing list