IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail

IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail

IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail

harryl at us.ibm.com harryl at us.ibm.com
Fri Jun 23 13:31:27 EDT 2000

If you think e-mail DISCUSSION is disruptive, just imaging getting print
job notifications in your e-mail too!

Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems

don at lexmark.com
Sent by: owner-ipp at pwg.org
06/23/2000 10:34 AM

        To:     ipp at pwg.org
        Subject:        IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail

I find this method of working an issue to be terrible.  E-mail is terribly
disruptive and hard to follow.  By the time the next post comes in, I've
forgotten the next set of points to be made.

Ever heard of lawyers arguing a case before a Judge over e-mail.  I rest
case!! :>)
(geez... I can't believe I made my point by using a lawyer as a GOOD

* Don Wright                 don at lexmark.com *
* Chair, Printer Working Group               *
* Chair, IEEE MSC                            *
*                                            *
* Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances  *
* Lexmark International                      *
* 740 New Circle Rd                          *
* Lexington, Ky 40550                        *
* 859-232-4808 (phone) 859-232-6740 (fax)    *
* (Former area code until 10/1 was 606)      *

More information about the Ipp mailing list