IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7

IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7

IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7

Carl-Uno Manros carl at manros.com
Thu Jun 29 10:43:50 EDT 2000


Harry,

No, no, we can't keeep changing the rules or we will not get anything out of
this.

Also your suggested alternative d) is the same as b), we only have 4
alternatives.

Carl-Uno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: harryl at us.ibm.com [mailto:harryl at us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 6:12 AM
> To: Hugo Parra
> Cc: carl at manros.com; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com; ipp at pwg.org; Paul Moore;
> kugler at us.ibm.com
> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
> by July 7
>
>
>
>
>
> I would amend Hugo's questions... and request that the options be as
> follows:
>
>   a) over email
>   b) over IPP (a.k.a. intelligent polling)
>   c) over INDP (new IPP-like protocol, but works in the opposite
> direction)
>   d) "Native" IPP notifications (new - augment IPP to allow multiple
> responses to any operation)
>   e) over SNMP
>   f) don't mandate any
>
> Harry Lewis
> IBM Printing Systems
>
>
>
>
> "Hugo Parra" <HPARRA at novell.com>
> Sent by: owner-ipp at pwg.org
> 06/28/2000 08:15 PM
>
>
>         To:     <cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com>, <carl at manros.com>,
> <pmoore at peerless.com>
>         cc:     <ipp at pwg.org>
>         Subject:        RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification
> delivery method by July 7
>
>
> Shouldn't the options be ...
>
>   a) over email
>   b) over IPP (a.k.a. intelligent polling)
>   c) over INDP (new IPP-like protocol, but works in the opposite
> direction)
>   d) over SNMP
>   e) don't mandate any
>
> Otherwise those who give each entry a weight of zero, basically through
> away their vote.
>
> -Hugo
>
> >>> "Carl-Uno Manros" <carl at manros.com> 06/28/00 07:52PM >>>
> Oh no, I managed to not be completely clear after all.
>
> The weighting is for the IETF standards texts.
>
> What gets tested in the bake-off is the decision of the PWG, which hosts
> the
> bake-off event, and has nothing to do with this exercise.
>
> Carl-Uno
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ipp at pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp at pwg.org]On Behalf Of
> > pmoore at peerless.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:47 PM
> > To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
> > Cc: IETF-IPP
> > Subject: Re: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
> > by July 7
> >
> >
> > If this is a vote for making things mandatory :-
> >
> > 0 a) over email
> > 0 b) over IPP (a.k.a. intelligent polling)
> > 0 c) over INDP (new IPP-like protocol, but works in the opposite
> > direction)
> > 0 d) over SNMP
> >
> > I dont think mandating is useful
> >
> > If this is a vote for 'what specs do we need to agree and bakeoff ASAP'
> >
> > 2 a) over email
> > 0 b) over IPP (a.k.a. intelligent polling)
> > 2 c) over INDP (new IPP-like protocol, but works in the opposite
> > direction)
> > 0 d) over SNMP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com> on 06/28/2000 05:17:16
> PM
> >
> > To:   IETF-IPP <ipp at pwg.org>
> > cc:    (bcc: Paul Moore/AUCO/US)
> >
> > Subject:  IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery
> > method by July 7
> >
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> > The IETF does not do voting, but we can ask people to allocate weights
> to
> > their favorite method. From the result I hope to get a picture of
> > whether we
> > have a clear "rough consensus" favorite, or if we should just avoid
> trying
> > to make any particular notification delivery method the "required" or
> > "mandated" one.
> >
> > So let the weightings begin!
> >
> > Here are the rules:
> >
> > 1) We have 4 candidate notification delivery methods, briefly
> > described as:
> >
> >  a) over email
> >  b) over IPP (a.k.a. intelligent polling)
> >  c) over INDP (new IPP-like protocol, but works in the opposite
> direction)
> >  d) over SNMP
> >
> > 2) You have a total of maximum 4 weight points to allocate between the 4
> > methods above.
> >
> >  a) You can put all your 4 points on one favorite and leave the
> > other three
> > with 0 each. (the 'all eggs in one basket' option)
> >  b) If you don't really mind which method, you can give 1 point to each
> of
> > the methods. (the 'chicken' option)
> >  c) You can allocate your 4 points somewhere between the two extreme
> cases
> > above. (the 'diplomatic' options)
> >  d) If you don't want to make ANY of the methods "required" or
> "mandated",
> > put a 0 for ALL four methods! (the 'don't even try it' option)
> >
> > If you still haven't understood the rules, please read the above
> > text 3 more
> > times, before you make a fool of yourself....., or of me for not
> > being clear
> > enough ;-{
> >
> > So please collect your wits and send your weights to the IPP DL no later
> > than next Friday July 7!
> >
> > Have fun.... and remember that if you do not participate you cannot win!
> >
> > Carl-Uno
> >
> > Carl-Uno Manros
> > Principal Engineer - Xerox Architecture Center - Xerox Corporation
> > 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
> > Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
> > Email: manros at cp10.es.xerox.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>




More information about the Ipp mailing list