Given that IPP was originally conceived as being an Internet
protocol and *not* particularly an intranet protocol, I agree
with Bill and Elliot and cast all my votes for e-mail.
ElliottBradshaw at oaktech.com wrote:
>> Same vote (all for email), same reasoning.
>> Elliott Bradshaw
> Director, SW Engineering
> Oak Technology Imaging Division
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wagner,William [mailto:bwagner at digprod.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 10:53 AM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
> by July 7
>> Since this preference indication is only for what is in the spec as
> mandated, I cast all four points for MAIL TO. That is not to detract from
> the merit or even (under certain circumstances) the superiority of one or
> more of the other approaches, and I am assuming that at least INDP and IPP
> (although the latter may not technically be notification) will be specified,
> implemented and verified.
>> William A. Wagner (Bill Wagner)
> Director of Technology
> Imaging Division
> NETsilicon, Inc.