IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right

IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right

IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right

Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM harryl at us.ibm.com
Tue Aug 22 18:22:03 EDT 2000


I was actually shooting for something simpler in the original proposal 
(... why Harry must be insane?)... characterized by

1. Subscription by default (by virtue of job submission)
2. Server "directed" (when and/or where) polling (optimization)
   - In the scenario, below, the client polls "immediately". What if there 
is a large queue in front of the job?
   - Server "directed" polling provides the opportunity for indirection 
which could branch the notification process off to an INDP or other 
notification service.
   - This form of polling was intended to minimize the duration of the 
"dribbling" of backchannel information to, exactly, the duration of a 
print job (which didn't seem too "unnatural").
3. Fixed content (simple subset to represent job progress, completion and 
associated device "distress"). 

Nonetheless, I think ippgetw may represent a viable convergence of INDP 
and the quest for leveraging native (to IPP) infrastructure which was one 
of our key goals. Simply stated, if IPP makes it through the firewall, 
(native) notifications will make it through the firewall. 
 
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems




"Herriot, Robert" <Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com>
08/22/2000 02:39 PM

 
        To:     pmoore at peerless.com, "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald at sharplabs.com>
        cc:     Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS, bwagner at digprod.com, ipp at pwg.org, "Herriot, 
Robert" <Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com>, Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
        Subject:        RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right


There is a simple extension to "ippget" that does what Harry wants. I'll
call the solution "ippgetw" for "ipp get and wait"

1. The user subscribes for this Delivery Method in the same way as for
"ippget" but instead uses the "ippgetw" scheme in the
"notify-recipient-uri".

2. The Subscription tells the Printer what Events the listener is 
interested
in.

3. The client obtains the Event Notifications by performing the
Get-Notifications operation with the same URL as in the
"notify-recipient-uri". This is just like "ippget" except that Event
Notifications keep coming in the response.

4. The Printer performs the Get-Notifications operation as follows
    a) it finds all Subscriptions associated with the specified
       "notify-recipient-uri" (like "ippget").
    b) it returns all Event Notifications that it is holding for the
       specified Subscription objects (like "ippget"). This means that
       the client doesn't miss any events between the time of Subscription
       and the Get-Notifications operation. This step could be omitted
       if it is OK to lose Event Notifications when the client is not
       performing the Get-Notifications operation.
    c) it returns Event Notifications as they occur (unlike "ipp-get").

5. The Get-Notifications operation terminates in the following ways:
    a) the client closes the connection. The Printer continues to save
       Event Notifications as specified in step 4b) until all 
Subscriptions
       associated with the "notify-recipient-uri" are canceled.
    b) the Printer closes the connection when there are no longer any
       Subscription Objects for the specified URL (in
       "notify-recipient-uri"), e.g. when a Job completes and associated
       Subscription Objects are removed.
    c) a time-out or failure occurs. The actions are the same as step 5a.

Note: unlike "ippget", the Printer doesn't need to return
"suggested-ask-again-time-interval" or "begin-to-expire-time-interval"
because the client performs the Get-Notification operation as soon as
possible. But according to step b), the Printer does keep Event
Notifications for a short period of time, at least when there is no
connection open.  The Printer need not keep Event Notifications after it
sends them if there is no requirement for two clients to use the same 
value
of "notify-recipient-uri" and no requirement for a client to get lost 
Event
Notification by reopening the connection.





More information about the Ipp mailing list