IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

McDonald, Ira imcdonald at sharplabs.com
Wed Aug 23 10:58:08 EDT 2000


Hi Bob,

So I checked again (as I did yesterday).  Bottom of page 16
for message body content says MUST for a list of localized
content.

That has to be fixed.

Cheers,
- Ira


-----Original Message-----
From: Herriot, Robert [mailto:Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:48 PM
To: McDonald, Ira; Herriot, Robert; 'jkm at underscore.com'
Cc: 'ned.freed at innosoft.com'; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]




> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:24 PM
> To meet your (and other PWG members) desires, simply
> delete all language about the content OR change it
> be SHOULD (RECOMMENDED) and punt on testing.

The language in the spec has said "SHOULD" all along.

We have tried to recommend content in a general way and leave the specific
phrasing to the vendor. For example, we recommend that a printer name be
present, but let the vendor choose the words.



More information about the Ipp mailing list