IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

Herriot, Robert Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com
Wed Aug 23 17:44:01 EDT 2000


Please give me more context, such as document version and line number.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:58 AM
> To: 'Herriot, Robert'; McDonald, Ira; 'jkm at underscore.com'
> Cc: 'ned.freed at innosoft.com'; ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
> The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
> 
> 
> Hi Bob,
> 
> So I checked again (as I did yesterday).  Bottom of page 16
> for message body content says MUST for a list of localized
> content.
> 
> That has to be fixed.
> 
> Cheers,
> - Ira
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herriot, Robert [mailto:Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:48 PM
> To: McDonald, Ira; Herriot, Robert; 'jkm at underscore.com'
> Cc: 'ned.freed at innosoft.com'; ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
> The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:24 PM
> > To meet your (and other PWG members) desires, simply
> > delete all language about the content OR change it
> > be SHOULD (RECOMMENDED) and punt on testing.
> 
> The language in the spec has said "SHOULD" all along.
> 
> We have tried to recommend content in a general way and leave 
> the specific
> phrasing to the vendor. For example, we recommend that a 
> printer name be
> present, but let the vendor choose the words.
> 



More information about the Ipp mailing list