If we can agree to the correct document format, prototyping could be a
matter of minutes.
dhw
Michael R Sweet
<msweet at apple.com
> To
Dave Whitehead <david at lexmark.com>
07/31/2008 02:02 cc
PM Ira McDonald
<blueroofmusic at gmail.com>,
ipp at pwg.org, "Farrell, Lee"
<Lee.Farrell at cda.canon.com>,
owner-ipp at pwg.org,
ptykodi at tykodi.com
Subject
Re: IPP> RFC: Add required
document-format values for IPP v2?
Dave Whitehead wrote:
> I think option 1 may be the way to proceed (if that's what we want to
do!)
> since it would then be just another document we reference in the IPPv2x
> document.
But won't option 1 (write a new standard, reference it in IPP/2.x)
still require prototyping, etc?
Plus, I don't see how we are getting around the prototype requirements
for 2.x - we *are* adding new content WRT version numbers, and that
requires prototyping to do any kind of testing/validation between
implementations.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael R Sweet Senior Printing System Engineer